We all know that Wikipedia is a open and free encyclopedia where real and authentic contents are kept. It is the only encyclopedia where public are allowed to post their content. It holds the branches of knowledge. Wikipedia always tends to maintain reliability they are conscious to make Wikipedia as reliable encyclopedia from different perspective. They wants to give authentic information to their users.
Reliability of Wikipedia:
Wikipedia has a reliability evaluating model where they measures reliability of an articles. It is public encyclopedia so they can check the authentic information about articles. They verify about the format and styles of an articles. They instantly remove the article written against the human rights. They also check the sources of an articles from where an author bought it. Wikipedia also verify weather the content is under copyright or not of any sources. if they found the issue of copyright in any content the article will be removed. Wikipedia doesn’t let the serious content as it is. they verifies it by taking expert’s opinion. they heir the groups to study on the sensitive content. They also catch burning issue and updates those articles according to the needs. Wikipedia always demand the information loop from the author. These assessments helps them to detect spams. Wikipedia is multi-informative encyclopedia so that it coves almost all fields of information. Though, it is not in the rules of wiki to release the spammer but Wikipedia has enough tools to detect the false information expect the anonymous edition.
Most of the scientific and health related information are not authenticate in Wikipedia. The official of Wikipedia had said that without taking expert’s opinion obeying the articles of this field will be serious for us. they has compared such kind of articles with the public toilet. It is because Public toilet is for all and Wikipedia is also a free encyclopedia where public are allowed to put their articles. Public toilet is usually dirty or may be, same like that Wikipedia’s contents may be mis-leader to you in the perspective of health and science or in any other sensitive contents which deals with the life of people directly.
So, here TECH BYTE concludes with some opinions that will make you further more clear about your queries:
Wikipedia is reliable source of information but not an authentic one. You need to verify on your own for the important information. Deep inside, don’t trust the medical and health related contents or any sensitive content blindly. Wikipedia own has said that you must need to deal with expert when it comes on the life direct relating subjective matters. At last, Wikipedia holds reliability but not authentication. However, Wikipedia is working to make itself as an authenticate encyclopedia.
We hope these guidelines help you to know wikipedia is focusing on authentication. If any queries arise regarding this topic then ICT BYTE recommend you to comment below. Here, we are always active to help you so don’t hesitate to share your doubt.